Evaluating Digital Work
The majority of the information on this page comes courtersy of the dhnotes Evaluating Digital Work page as of September 2019. dhnotes is as collaborative web projected created by Dennis Tenen and Alex Gil with the added contributions of Scott Weingart.
Peer Review Guidelines
- DH Commons: Review Guidelines
- Institut für Dokumentologie und Editorik: Kriterien für die Besprechung digitaler Editionen, Version 1.0
- Basic Principles for Modernist Networks Peer Review
- Towards a Peer Review of GeoHumanities Projects
- 18thConnect: Peer Review
- McClurken, Jeffrey. Revised Digital History Review Guidelines
- Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in Art and Architectural History
- Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University (ISAW), “Assessing Research at ISAW” (2012)
- ADA Review Process
- UCLA Digital Humanities, “A Student Collaborators’ Bill of Rights,”
- Review Process for Reviews in DH
Tenure & Promotion Guidelines
- ACH Guidelines for Assessment of Digital Scholarship in Tenure and Promotion
- MLA: Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- AHA: Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in History
- University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Promotion & Tenure Criteria for Assessing Digital Research in the Humanities
- Memorandum From The Emory College Humanities Council Regarding The Evaluation Of Digital Scholarship
Readings
- Closing the Evaluation Gap. Special Issue of JDH. Vol. 1, No. 4 Fall 2012
- Schreibman, Susan, et al. Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Introduction
- Anderson, Steve and Tara McPherson. Engaging Digital Scholarship: Thoughts on Evaluating Multimedia Scholarship
- Rockwell, Geoffrey. On the Evaluation of Digital Media as Scholarship
- Nowviskie, Bethany. Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship
- McGann, Jerome. On Creating a Usable Future
- Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Peer Review, Judgment, and Reading
- Kristine M. Bartanen, “Digital Scholarship and the Tenure and Promotion Process,” The Academic Commons (July 24, 2014)
- Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, et al., “The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics,” Nature 520 (April 23, 2015): 429–31
- Todd Presner, “How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship” (2011)
- Sarah E. Bond and Kevin Gannon, “Public Writing and the Junio Scholar (2019)